The 2008 State of
The output of the LGPMS is the State of
For the Calendar Year 2008, the Performance, Productivity and Development indices for the City Government of Meycauayan are briefly stated below:
Performance Area | Input (Performance) | Output (Productivity) | Outcome (Development) | Average |
Governance | 4.78 | 4.33 | - | 4.56 |
Administration | 4.78 | 4.42 | - | 4.60 |
Social Services | 4.08 | 4.13 | 3.96 | 4.06 |
Economic Development | 4.83 | 3.25 | 2.00 | 3.36 |
Environmental Management | 3.00 | 3.50 | 3.00 | 3.17 |
Overall Performance Index | 4.29 | 3.93 | 2.98 | 3.96 |
From the table illustrated above, we obtained the overall performance rating of 3.96 or an adjectival value of slightly below high rating for the profile year 2008 among all performance areas.
In terms of comparative rating based on Inputs (Performance), the City Government of Meycauayan performed high in the performance areas of Governance, Administration, Social Services and Economic Development as all service indicators thereto were met and complied with, like availability of Executive and Legislative Agenda and City government policies, existence of functioning health and school facilities supported by infrastructure projects, communication and power facilities and financing institutions; however, to further improve on the overall performance capabilities, the performance area-focus shall be on Environmental Management particularly giving attention to the formulation of the 10-year Solid Waste Management Plan which should be approved by the National Solid Waste Management Commission.
In terms of performance comparison based on Productivity (Output), the Local Government Unit had rated high in the areas of Governance, Administration and Social Services as service indicators were favorably met and complied with, which include the presence of Information Office properly manned by competent staff, presence of Comprehensive Development Plan, availability and quality of health and nutrition services; whereas somewhat medium in the area of Economic Development and Environmental Management. However, the allocated amount for projects in favor of the population in need from the 20% component of the Internal Revenue Allotment is slightly below the benchmark, although environmental programs were given utmost priority, in adherence to the mandates of R.A 9003, otherwise known as Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000. Further, there is no garbage composting facility, thus no data on the total volume of garbage composted and the number of industries that require pollution control facilities, it is then necessary that the City set up programs and procedures to gather and collate data required.
No comments:
Post a Comment